Maybe TIE Avenger or Marauder? Mr. Stevie said something along the lines of “watch the skies,” so that cancels out my original guess of it being a Sandcrawler!
Marauder seems more Haslab-esque... also, I can't see them releasing a $140 mainline Vader TIE, then asking for. $350+ Haslab TIE Avenger...Maybe TIE Avenger or Marauder? Mr. Stevie said something along the lines of “watch the skies,” so that cancels out my original guess of it being a Sandcrawler!
That's the thing, TVC aren't really toys anymore, they're collectibles aimed at adults - who knows if many kids even look at this stuff. I could see them putting the SC cast in the Epic line, because at $8, those are more reasonable toys for kids, parents, and gift givers, but TVC is more than double the price. I think some of the SC figures from TBS are at discount outlets like Ollies ($5-10), so that's another option. Overall, maybe they think the demand isn't strong enough for merchandising certain streaming media in the 3.75 scale?One Skeleton Crew? Seriously! They should drop all four kids together at least. Its like they've done with Bad Batch...years between members of a team. I understand that there is a lot of different "streams" now, but these are toys right? Even as a kid with plenty of imagination to have Luke Skywalker adventures with Micronauts and as a "Gulliver" in the land of little green army men it would have been painful not to have a stormtrooper or R2 (or [you fill in the blank] to interact with as well. I'm really flabbergasted that the line runners at Hasbro aren't getting main characters of media out in close proximity, it make no sense. We still don't have a TVC Bodhi or Baze. Okay, I'll stop the rant now.
I think you mean Boba Fett’s Starship Anakin.It definitely seems they are anti-children figures in TVC... by now we should have young Leia, young Luke, Skeleton Crew kids... hell, slave Anakin, young Boba Fett, and Omega too.
😉
That got me to thinking, how does Hasbro rebrand "Slave" Leia? "Jabba's Palace" Leia as if she was just a patron or a guest?! 😜I think you mean Boba Fett’s Starship Anakin.
I wonder if Hasbro is just wary of having children-sized figures for $16.99 and having collectors complain about the lack of value due to very few pack-ins, if any. Here's what I could think of:It definitely seems they are anti-children figures in TVC... by now we should have young Leia, young Luke, Skeleton Crew kids... hell, slave Anakin, young Boba Fett, and Omega too.
😉
I'm pretty sure one of those is going to be Greedo since they said he would be released in the mainline on a different card.I am most excited by the following rumored characters:
A New Hope - again, "hoping" for a Cantina patron
Well... that is NOT the figure I was "hoping" for seeing as how I've already backed the Haslab Cantina and am not a carded collector. Oh well.I'm pretty sure one of those is going to be Greedo since they said he would be released in the mainline on a different card.
They refer to her as Huttslayer Leia in some sourcesThat got me to thinking, how does Hasbro rebrand "Slave" Leia? "Jabba's Palace" Leia as if she was just a patron or a guest?! 😜
Jason
Well, I shouldn't say "pretty sure" that rumored figure is Greedo. It could be something different and Greedo will pop up in the mainline later.I'm pretty sure one of those is going to be Greedo since they said he would be released in the mainline on a different card.
Then they could make the Onnikatay sisters?One of the New Hope figures could be the lesser known Cantina Patron Arlielay Ousschay who is often mistaken for Arliel Schous since they're nearly identical. That way Hasbro wouldn't be making a figure that they said they wouldn't
I don't disagree with your point...and I think Hasbro and maybe some members of our community are confused about collectibles. Our figures are called "collectibles" because people collect them, but that doesn't change their nature. Stamps, as collectible as they may be, can still be used to send mail and coins are still legal tender. A Sideshow bust, or Figurearts samurai Boba Fett may be "simple" collectibles. Small dolls that can be put in "action poses" and interact with accessories and playsets (and especially survive an adventure in my yard with all parts intact) are toys, maybe collectible toys, but still toys - even if they are aimed at 50-something-year-olds. We can debate articulation, price point, accesory count, target audience and what purchasers do with them, but their design indicates that their basic purpose is still to be "played with." Playsets, creatures that can be ridden upon, and vehicle design all confirm this. Which is why I am so confused about Hasbro's approach to figure selection. They design figures as toys, they market figures as toys, but they don't distribute figures in a way that makes sense as toys. Oh, well...I'm still happy that we are getting new things, so I should probably just shut up.That's the thing, TVC aren't really toys anymore, they're collectibles aimed at adults - who knows if many kids even look at this stuff. I could see them putting the SC cast in the Epic line, because at $8, those are more reasonable toys for kids, parents, and gift givers, but TVC is more than double the price. I think some of the SC figures from TBS are at discount outlets like Ollies ($5-10), so that's another option. Overall, maybe they think the demand isn't strong enough for merchandising certain streaming media in the 3.75 scale?
Yes, of course, action figures can generally be classified as toys, but some of us, alongside Hasbro refer to them as collectibles because of the primary consumers. It's really just a classification based on the buyer; the description doesn't change the nature of the product. I have no doubt that some adults play with these, lol, but since kids aren't usually into TVC, nor buying them, they're dubbed collectibles. I miss the days when the basic action figure line was geared towards both consumer groups, instead of segregated - it was a simpler time, and the prices also reflected that.I don't disagree with your point...and I think Hasbro and maybe some members of our community are confused about collectibles. Our figures are called "collectibles" because people collect them, but that doesn't change their nature. Stamps, as collectible as they may be, can still be used to send mail and coins are still legal tender. A Sideshow bust, or Figurearts samurai Boba Fett may be "simple" collectibles. Small dolls that can be put in "action poses" and interact with accessories and playsets (and especially survive an adventure in my yard with all parts intact) are toys, maybe collectible toys, but still toys - even if they are aimed at 50-something-year-olds. We can debate articulation, price point, accesory count, target audience and what purchasers do with them, but their design indicates that their basic purpose is still to be "played with." Playsets, creatures that can be ridden upon, and vehicle design all confirm this. Which is why I am so confused about Hasbro's approach to figure selection. They design figures as toys, they market figures as toys, but they don't distribute figures in a way that makes sense as toys. Oh, well...I'm still happy that we are getting new things, so I should probably just shut up.